<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 657 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347900</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the reassessment proceedings were invalid as the notice under section 148 was issued without proper approval under section 151 of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the orders of the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) were quashed, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and ensuring the legality of the jurisdiction assumed by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:19:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 657 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347900</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the reassessment proceedings were invalid as the notice under section 148 was issued without proper approval under section 151 of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the orders of the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) were quashed, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and ensuring the legality of the jurisdiction assumed by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>