<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 645 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347888</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty notice issued under Section 274 r/w Section 271(1)(c) was invalid due to non-application of mind and failure to specify the charge. Consequently, the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) was deleted. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:18:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 645 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347888</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty notice issued under Section 274 r/w Section 271(1)(c) was invalid due to non-application of mind and failure to specify the charge. Consequently, the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) was deleted. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>