<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 644 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347887</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, treating the capital gain as Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) instead of Short Term Capital Gain (STCG) on the sale of a residential property. The Tribunal also allowed deductions under sections 54EC and 54F of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was allowed, with the order pronounced on 18th August 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:18:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 644 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347887</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, treating the capital gain as Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) instead of Short Term Capital Gain (STCG) on the sale of a residential property. The Tribunal also allowed deductions under sections 54EC and 54F of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was allowed, with the order pronounced on 18th August 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>