https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9888 In the Jaymac Case, the court found that the transaction was prima facie void under section 281 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, necessitating a civil court declaration. The appeal was allowed, quashing the single judge's order and directing the attachment order to continue for three months or until a civil court order is obtained. In the Munir Ahmed Case, the court remanded the matter back to the Tax Recovery Officer to dispose of objections within six months, after finding that the Recovery Officer must investigate legal ownership before continuing the attachment. Both appeals were disposed of without any order as to costs. en-us Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9888 In the Jaymac Case, the court found that the transaction was prima facie void under section 281 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, necessitating a civil court declaration. The appeal was allowed, quashing the single judge's order and directing the attachment order to continue for three months or until a civil court order is obtained. In the Munir Ahmed Case, the court remanded the matter back to the Tax Recovery Officer to dispose of objections within six months, after finding that the Recovery Officer must investigate legal ownership before continuing the attachment. Both appeals were disposed of without any order as to costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9888