<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 640 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347883</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the validity of the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the assessee&#039;s challenge on the ground of borrowed satisfaction. Regarding the disallowance of alleged bogus purchases, the ITAT directed that the disallowance be restricted to 12.5% of the purchases, partly allowing the appeals filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 640 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347883</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the validity of the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the assessee&#039;s challenge on the ground of borrowed satisfaction. Regarding the disallowance of alleged bogus purchases, the ITAT directed that the disallowance be restricted to 12.5% of the purchases, partly allowing the appeals filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>