<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 633 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347876</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the notice issued under section 153C was invalid due to the lack of recorded satisfaction by the AO of the searched person. Consequently, the assessment order and the addition of Rs. 1,93,57,057/- were quashed. The appeal of the assessee was allowed based on jurisdictional grounds, and the order was pronounced on 14th June 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:17:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 633 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347876</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the notice issued under section 153C was invalid due to the lack of recorded satisfaction by the AO of the searched person. Consequently, the assessment order and the addition of Rs. 1,93,57,057/- were quashed. The appeal of the assessee was allowed based on jurisdictional grounds, and the order was pronounced on 14th June 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>