https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347873 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order that disallowed CENVAT credit for service tax paid on common services. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing vehicle accessories, successfully argued that the denial of credit under Rule 7 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was incorrect. The Tribunal found that the services in question were related to all units, making distribution impossible, and concluded that the credit was validly taken. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, establishing clarity on the issue of CENVAT credit for common services across multiple manufacturing units. en-us Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:01:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347873 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order that disallowed CENVAT credit for service tax paid on common services. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing vehicle accessories, successfully argued that the denial of credit under Rule 7 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was incorrect. The Tribunal found that the services in question were related to all units, making distribution impossible, and concluded that the credit was validly taken. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, establishing clarity on the issue of CENVAT credit for common services across multiple manufacturing units. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347873