<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 100 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9886</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the proceedings that reduced the 30-day period for payment of tax demand. The original 30-day period was upheld for the assessment year 2001-02 and extended for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05. The court emphasized the necessity for valid reasons to reduce the payment period and the importance of complying with principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 100 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9886</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the proceedings that reduced the 30-day period for payment of tax demand. The original 30-day period was upheld for the assessment year 2001-02 and extended for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05. The court emphasized the necessity for valid reasons to reduce the payment period and the importance of complying with principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>