<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 616 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347859</link>
    <description>A remand limited to classification does not, by itself, bar an assessee from claiming exemption notifications if the benefit is otherwise available. The decisive question remains whether the assessee can establish eligibility and compliance with the procedural conditions attached to the notifications. Here, the claim failed because the adjudicating authority independently examined the notifications and found that the assessee had not demonstrated the required procedural adherence. The legal position on the scope of the remand was accepted, but the exemption claim was rejected on merits for non-compliance with the notification requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 07:55:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 616 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347859</link>
      <description>A remand limited to classification does not, by itself, bar an assessee from claiming exemption notifications if the benefit is otherwise available. The decisive question remains whether the assessee can establish eligibility and compliance with the procedural conditions attached to the notifications. Here, the claim failed because the adjudicating authority independently examined the notifications and found that the assessee had not demonstrated the required procedural adherence. The legal position on the scope of the remand was accepted, but the exemption claim was rejected on merits for non-compliance with the notification requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>