<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 611 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347854</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed most of the contested input services as they were found to be related to the manufacturing activity. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was set aside due to no suppression of facts, with directions to pay interest on the reversed CENVAT credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 611 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347854</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed most of the contested input services as they were found to be related to the manufacturing activity. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was set aside due to no suppression of facts, with directions to pay interest on the reversed CENVAT credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>