https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347851 The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, finding merit in the appellant's argument that the process undertaken did not amount to manufacture, thus entitling them to credit on sulphur powder received from the supplier. The tribunal emphasized that revenue officers could not question assessments made by officers with jurisdiction over suppliers. The appellant was advised to seek regularisation of the credit availed from the Central Govt. The judgment was pronounced on 17/08/17. en-us Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Sep 2017 07:51:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347851 The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, finding merit in the appellant's argument that the process undertaken did not amount to manufacture, thus entitling them to credit on sulphur powder received from the supplier. The tribunal emphasized that revenue officers could not question assessments made by officers with jurisdiction over suppliers. The appellant was advised to seek regularisation of the credit availed from the Central Govt. The judgment was pronounced on 17/08/17. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347851