https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347848 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in the case, regarding the eligibility of Cenvat credit on specific items and the recovery of duty due to the loss of molasses. The demand for Cenvat credit was set aside, except for a minor amount, as the items were considered admissible as capital goods. The Tribunal found the demand for duty due to the loss of molasses unsustainable, as the loss was within normal limits. Consequently, the majority of the impugned Order-in-Original was set aside, and the appellant was granted consequential relief in accordance with the law. en-us Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Sep 2017 07:50:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347848 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in the case, regarding the eligibility of Cenvat credit on specific items and the recovery of duty due to the loss of molasses. The demand for Cenvat credit was set aside, except for a minor amount, as the items were considered admissible as capital goods. The Tribunal found the demand for duty due to the loss of molasses unsustainable, as the loss was within normal limits. Consequently, the majority of the impugned Order-in-Original was set aside, and the appellant was granted consequential relief in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347848