<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 594 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347837</link>
    <description>Incomplete parts and accessories in semi-knock down condition were not treated as functional electronic calculators, so a notification imposing anti-dumping duty on electronic calculators imported from China did not apply and the duty demand was set aside. Misdeclaration in description and quantity justified re-determination of assessable value under the Customs Valuation Rules on the basis of similar imported goods and market enquiry; the enhanced valuation was sustained because it had been admitted in the proprietor&#039;s statement. Consequential confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty under section 114A were maintained, while penalty under section 114AA was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 594 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347837</link>
      <description>Incomplete parts and accessories in semi-knock down condition were not treated as functional electronic calculators, so a notification imposing anti-dumping duty on electronic calculators imported from China did not apply and the duty demand was set aside. Misdeclaration in description and quantity justified re-determination of assessable value under the Customs Valuation Rules on the basis of similar imported goods and market enquiry; the enhanced valuation was sustained because it had been admitted in the proprietor&#039;s statement. Consequential confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty under section 114A were maintained, while penalty under section 114AA was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>