<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1563 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194543</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A) order that disallowance under section 14A of the IT Act is not applicable when no exempt income is received, as per the provisions of the IT Act. The decision was based on established legal principles and interpretations, citing precedents such as the Cheminvest Ltd. case and the Prathista Industries Ltd. case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 21:47:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1563 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194543</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A) order that disallowance under section 14A of the IT Act is not applicable when no exempt income is received, as per the provisions of the IT Act. The decision was based on established legal principles and interpretations, citing precedents such as the Cheminvest Ltd. case and the Prathista Industries Ltd. case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>