https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194530 Repeal by implication is not inferred unless the later statute is so inconsistent with the earlier law that both cannot operate together, or unless it forms a complete and exhaustive code. The Supreme Court of India held that the Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 and the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 operate in different fields and regulate different aspects of the employer-worker relationship, so they are to be read harmoniously. The 1961 Act did not impliedly repeal the 1948 Act; the earlier welfare enactment continues to apply except to the limited extent of any actual overlap where the later special provision prevails. en-us Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jul 2024 12:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194530 Repeal by implication is not inferred unless the later statute is so inconsistent with the earlier law that both cannot operate together, or unless it forms a complete and exhaustive code. The Supreme Court of India held that the Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 and the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 operate in different fields and regulate different aspects of the employer-worker relationship, so they are to be read harmoniously. The 1961 Act did not impliedly repeal the 1948 Act; the earlier welfare enactment continues to apply except to the limited extent of any actual overlap where the later special provision prevails. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194530