https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347827 The court upheld the first respondent's decision, dismissing the writ petition challenging the rejection of the revision petition under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act. The petitioner failed to prove the alleged keying error in the return filing process for the assessment year 2012-13. The court found the first respondent's decision justified based on factual analysis and legal principles governing the Commissioner's powers under Section 264. The writ petition was dismissed without costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed. en-us Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Mar 2018 18:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347827 The court upheld the first respondent's decision, dismissing the writ petition challenging the rejection of the revision petition under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act. The petitioner failed to prove the alleged keying error in the return filing process for the assessment year 2012-13. The court found the first respondent's decision justified based on factual analysis and legal principles governing the Commissioner's powers under Section 264. The writ petition was dismissed without costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347827