<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 555 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347798</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute over the eligibility of Cenvat credit for service tax paid by M/s Uflex Ltd. on services used in manufacturing final products. The Revenue denied credit, stating the services were not directly related to manufacturing. The appeals focused on interpreting the definition of &quot;input service,&quot; with M/s Uflex Ltd. citing a Bombay High Court ruling to support their claim. The final decision favored M/s Uflex Ltd., allowing the disputed Cenvat credit, emphasizing the significance of legal interpretations in tax credit disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 08:42:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 555 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347798</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute over the eligibility of Cenvat credit for service tax paid by M/s Uflex Ltd. on services used in manufacturing final products. The Revenue denied credit, stating the services were not directly related to manufacturing. The appeals focused on interpreting the definition of &quot;input service,&quot; with M/s Uflex Ltd. citing a Bombay High Court ruling to support their claim. The final decision favored M/s Uflex Ltd., allowing the disputed Cenvat credit, emphasizing the significance of legal interpretations in tax credit disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>