https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347796 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the printing services provided to the telecom company did not constitute business auxiliary service under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant's role was limited to printing bills based on provided data and preparing them for dispatch, without involvement in financial aspects or customer interactions related to billing. By considering its previous decisions and the specific nature of the appellant's activities, the Tribunal concluded that the service provided did not fall under the ambit of business auxiliary service, leading to the allowance of the appeal. en-us Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Sep 2017 08:41:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347796 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the printing services provided to the telecom company did not constitute business auxiliary service under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant's role was limited to printing bills based on provided data and preparing them for dispatch, without involvement in financial aspects or customer interactions related to billing. By considering its previous decisions and the specific nature of the appellant's activities, the Tribunal concluded that the service provided did not fall under the ambit of business auxiliary service, leading to the allowance of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347796