<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 551 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347794</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the refund claim was filed within the prescribed time limit as per the Central Excise Act and CENVAT Credit Rules. The appellant&#039;s argument that the time limit should be calculated from the end of the quarter of the export was accepted, following a previous Tribunal decision. Consequently, the appellant was deemed entitled to the refund claim, and the appeal was allowed with appropriate relief granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 551 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347794</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the refund claim was filed within the prescribed time limit as per the Central Excise Act and CENVAT Credit Rules. The appellant&#039;s argument that the time limit should be calculated from the end of the quarter of the export was accepted, following a previous Tribunal decision. Consequently, the appellant was deemed entitled to the refund claim, and the appeal was allowed with appropriate relief granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>