<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 550 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347793</link>
    <description>Service tax classification depends on the real nature of the work and the applicable levy period. Removal and collection of spillage inside mines for reuse in the conveyor system was not cleaning service, as it was not cleaning of commercial or industrial premises. Erection and commissioning of pipelines done before the introduction of installation service on 10.09.2004 could not be taxed under that category. Operation of water pumps was not manpower supply service because labour deployment was merely incidental to the contract. Barbed wire fencing for plantation purposes was not commercial or industrial construction service. The demands on all four heads were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 550 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347793</link>
      <description>Service tax classification depends on the real nature of the work and the applicable levy period. Removal and collection of spillage inside mines for reuse in the conveyor system was not cleaning service, as it was not cleaning of commercial or industrial premises. Erection and commissioning of pipelines done before the introduction of installation service on 10.09.2004 could not be taxed under that category. Operation of water pumps was not manpower supply service because labour deployment was merely incidental to the contract. Barbed wire fencing for plantation purposes was not commercial or industrial construction service. The demands on all four heads were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>