<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 548 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347791</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed based on legal principles and precedents cited, emphasizing the conclusion of proceedings upon fulfillment of payment obligations within the specified timeframe as per the Central Excise Act. The Member found that penalty proceedings against individuals associated with the firm could not continue once proceedings against the firm were resolved. The decision aligned with legal interpretation provided in cited case law, leading to the allowance of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 08:38:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 548 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347791</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed based on legal principles and precedents cited, emphasizing the conclusion of proceedings upon fulfillment of payment obligations within the specified timeframe as per the Central Excise Act. The Member found that penalty proceedings against individuals associated with the firm could not continue once proceedings against the firm were resolved. The decision aligned with legal interpretation provided in cited case law, leading to the allowance of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>