https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347789 The Tribunal set aside the Central Excise Duty demand, penalties, and allegations against the appellant company and its director due to insufficient evidence of clandestine manufacture and clearance. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of cross-examination for witness statements' admissibility and the necessity of corroborative evidence. The appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants, highlighting the significance of legal standards in evidence presentation. en-us Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Sep 2017 08:38:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347789 The Tribunal set aside the Central Excise Duty demand, penalties, and allegations against the appellant company and its director due to insufficient evidence of clandestine manufacture and clearance. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of cross-examination for witness statements' admissibility and the necessity of corroborative evidence. The appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants, highlighting the significance of legal standards in evidence presentation. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347789