https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347777 In discretionary governmental financial assistance schemes, the controlling policy is the one in force when the application is actually considered, unless the scheme creates a vested right. An earlier application does not by itself confer an enforceable entitlement or legitimate expectation to be assessed under a superseded policy, and sanction of study leave does not amount to an assurance of funding. Applying the revised policy in force on the consideration date, the claim failed because the institution and course did not meet the updated eligibility criteria. The Delhi HC upheld refusal of partial funding and set aside the contrary view that treated the application date as decisive. en-us Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Sep 2017 08:24:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347777 In discretionary governmental financial assistance schemes, the controlling policy is the one in force when the application is actually considered, unless the scheme creates a vested right. An earlier application does not by itself confer an enforceable entitlement or legitimate expectation to be assessed under a superseded policy, and sanction of study leave does not amount to an assurance of funding. Applying the revised policy in force on the consideration date, the claim failed because the institution and course did not meet the updated eligibility criteria. The Delhi HC upheld refusal of partial funding and set aside the contrary view that treated the application date as decisive. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347777