https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194501 The Supreme Court held that a mistake by the Administration in extending a higher pay scale to certain storekeepers did not justify granting equal pay to all storekeepers. The higher pay scale was deemed personal pay for existing incumbents and not a basis for equal pay for future employees. The Court emphasized that personal pay reasons do not trigger the "equal pay for equal work" principle. The Court concluded that the Tribunal erred in allowing the claim based on the equal pay doctrine, setting aside the Tribunal's order without awarding costs. en-us Tue, 11 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:42:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194501 The Supreme Court held that a mistake by the Administration in extending a higher pay scale to certain storekeepers did not justify granting equal pay to all storekeepers. The higher pay scale was deemed personal pay for existing incumbents and not a basis for equal pay for future employees. The Court emphasized that personal pay reasons do not trigger the "equal pay for equal work" principle. The Court concluded that the Tribunal erred in allowing the claim based on the equal pay doctrine, setting aside the Tribunal's order without awarding costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194501