https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194499 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the judgment in favor of the respondent. The court dismissed the writ petition, finding no wrongful intent by the oil company in rectifying distribution errors. It emphasized adherence to agreement terms and equitable kerosene distribution among agents, denying the respondent an independent quota for Barisha due to its exclusion from the 2000 agreement. The court upheld the rectification as necessary for fairness among all agents. en-us Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:36:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194499 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the judgment in favor of the respondent. The court dismissed the writ petition, finding no wrongful intent by the oil company in rectifying distribution errors. It emphasized adherence to agreement terms and equitable kerosene distribution among agents, denying the respondent an independent quota for Barisha due to its exclusion from the 2000 agreement. The court upheld the rectification as necessary for fairness among all agents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194499