<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 673 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194497</link>
    <description>The court held that the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of set off under Section 121A of the BSF Act read with Section 428 of the CrPC. The period of detention as an under-trial prisoner must be set off against the term of imprisonment imposed. The order denying this benefit was quashed, and the respondents were directed to grant the set off.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 673 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194497</link>
      <description>The court held that the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of set off under Section 121A of the BSF Act read with Section 428 of the CrPC. The period of detention as an under-trial prisoner must be set off against the term of imprisonment imposed. The order denying this benefit was quashed, and the respondents were directed to grant the set off.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>