<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 673 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194497</link>
    <description>A beneficial set-off provision under the Criminal Procedure Code applies to life imprisonment, because the phrase &quot;imprisonment for a term&quot; is wide enough to include a life sentence and the period spent in pre-trial custody must be credited against the remaining sentence. The benefit also extends where the conviction was recorded before insertion of the corresponding special provision in the Border Security Force Act, as the amendment operates prospectively on the sentence still to be served and does not unsettle the conviction already imposed. In the absence of a contrary provision in the special statute, the general criminal procedure rule on set-off continues to apply, and denial of credit for pre-conviction custody is invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 673 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194497</link>
      <description>A beneficial set-off provision under the Criminal Procedure Code applies to life imprisonment, because the phrase &quot;imprisonment for a term&quot; is wide enough to include a life sentence and the period spent in pre-trial custody must be credited against the remaining sentence. The benefit also extends where the conviction was recorded before insertion of the corresponding special provision in the Border Security Force Act, as the amendment operates prospectively on the sentence still to be served and does not unsettle the conviction already imposed. In the absence of a contrary provision in the special statute, the general criminal procedure rule on set-off continues to apply, and denial of credit for pre-conviction custody is invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>