https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194495 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's decision on the interpretation of Section 5(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. The High Court's ruling, which exempted wealth acquired before 1964 from being considered an offense, was deemed incorrect and in conflict with precedent. The case was remitted back to the High Court for a comprehensive review considering all aspects raised in the appeal. en-us Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Sep 2017 13:28:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194495 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's decision on the interpretation of Section 5(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. The High Court's ruling, which exempted wealth acquired before 1964 from being considered an offense, was deemed incorrect and in conflict with precedent. The case was remitted back to the High Court for a comprehensive review considering all aspects raised in the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194495