<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1144 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194492</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of additions on account of inadequate household withdrawals and non-genuine gift receipts was dismissed. The CIT(A) and Tribunal found that the AO lacked sufficient material evidence to support the additions, and the assessee had provided evidence to establish the genuineness of the transactions. The cross-objection by the assessee was dismissed as not pressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2017 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1144 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194492</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of additions on account of inadequate household withdrawals and non-genuine gift receipts was dismissed. The CIT(A) and Tribunal found that the AO lacked sufficient material evidence to support the additions, and the assessee had provided evidence to establish the genuineness of the transactions. The cross-objection by the assessee was dismissed as not pressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>