https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347745 The Tribunal upheld the classification of goods under Heading 2707.90 and confirmed that the process undertaken by the appellants amounted to manufacturing. The Tribunal directed the original authority to re-quantify duty liability, excluding demands beyond the normal period and any interest liability not properly adjudicated. The appeal was rejected, with instructions for the original authority to adjust duty liability accordingly. en-us Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 17:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347745 The Tribunal upheld the classification of goods under Heading 2707.90 and confirmed that the process undertaken by the appellants amounted to manufacturing. The Tribunal directed the original authority to re-quantify duty liability, excluding demands beyond the normal period and any interest liability not properly adjudicated. The appeal was rejected, with instructions for the original authority to adjust duty liability accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347745