<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 499 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347742</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside both the Order-in-Original and the Order-in-Appeal, allowing the appeal. The appellant was entitled to consequential relief as per the law, based on the High Court ruling emphasizing the appellant&#039;s diligence in ensuring proper payment of excise duty on claimed Cenvat credit inputs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2017 13:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 499 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347742</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside both the Order-in-Original and the Order-in-Appeal, allowing the appeal. The appellant was entitled to consequential relief as per the law, based on the High Court ruling emphasizing the appellant&#039;s diligence in ensuring proper payment of excise duty on claimed Cenvat credit inputs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>