<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 498 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347741</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondents in the appeal against the Order-in-Appeal regarding the recovery of Cenvat credit on steel items. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the demands, acknowledging the reversal of Cenvat credit before the Show Cause Notices were issued. Citing the Supreme Court ruling, the Tribunal held that reversing Cenvat credit before utilization equates to non-availment. Consequently, the Tribunal modified the Order-in-Appeal, deleting the appropriation of reversed credit against the demands. The demand for inadmissible Cenvat credit was set aside, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:26:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 498 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347741</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondents in the appeal against the Order-in-Appeal regarding the recovery of Cenvat credit on steel items. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the demands, acknowledging the reversal of Cenvat credit before the Show Cause Notices were issued. Citing the Supreme Court ruling, the Tribunal held that reversing Cenvat credit before utilization equates to non-availment. Consequently, the Tribunal modified the Order-in-Appeal, deleting the appropriation of reversed credit against the demands. The demand for inadmissible Cenvat credit was set aside, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>