<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 496 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347739</link>
    <description>Duty demand on aluminium extruded sections sent for job work was not sustainable because the record showed that central excise duty had already been paid before their final clearance from the factory. A demand cannot be maintained on goods that have already suffered duty, and the show cause notice proceeded on a premise inconsistent with that admitted payment. The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 496 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347739</link>
      <description>Duty demand on aluminium extruded sections sent for job work was not sustainable because the record showed that central excise duty had already been paid before their final clearance from the factory. A demand cannot be maintained on goods that have already suffered duty, and the show cause notice proceeded on a premise inconsistent with that admitted payment. The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>