<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 496 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347739</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the Order-in-Original and Order-in-Appeal. It held that demanding Central Excise duty on goods that had already undergone duty payment was impermissible under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision emphasized adherence to legal provisions on duty payments and the necessity for proper assessment before raising such demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 496 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347739</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the Order-in-Original and Order-in-Appeal. It held that demanding Central Excise duty on goods that had already undergone duty payment was impermissible under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision emphasized adherence to legal provisions on duty payments and the necessity for proper assessment before raising such demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>