<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1267 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194482</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Revenue to examine pending References with tax effects under Rs. 20 lakhs per Circular No.21 of 2015. Despite this, the Revenue did not comply, leading to the Court returning the unanswered References. The legal questions raised in these References were preserved for potential future consideration without specific costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2017 07:43:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1267 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194482</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Revenue to examine pending References with tax effects under Rs. 20 lakhs per Circular No.21 of 2015. Despite this, the Revenue did not comply, leading to the Court returning the unanswered References. The legal questions raised in these References were preserved for potential future consideration without specific costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>