<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1431 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194487</link>
    <description>Contempt proceedings cannot be expanded to obtain directions in unrelated income-tax appeals, writ matters, record production, affidavits, reward payment, or hearing recordings. The respondent was not a party to the underlying tax proceedings and therefore had no standing to seek relief in those matters. The Delhi High Court held that the applications were misdirected and outside the limited contempt jurisdiction, and that several prayers were either beyond jurisdiction or unnecessary because they were being dealt with in the same order. The applications were accordingly held not maintainable and dismissed, with costs imposed on several of them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2017 07:43:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1431 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194487</link>
      <description>Contempt proceedings cannot be expanded to obtain directions in unrelated income-tax appeals, writ matters, record production, affidavits, reward payment, or hearing recordings. The respondent was not a party to the underlying tax proceedings and therefore had no standing to seek relief in those matters. The Delhi High Court held that the applications were misdirected and outside the limited contempt jurisdiction, and that several prayers were either beyond jurisdiction or unnecessary because they were being dealt with in the same order. The applications were accordingly held not maintainable and dismissed, with costs imposed on several of them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>