<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 476 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347719</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the reopening of the assessment and delete the addition of unexplained investment in property. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence connecting the assessee with the transactions mentioned in the seized documents, leading to the dismissal of the department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 476 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347719</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the reopening of the assessment and delete the addition of unexplained investment in property. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence connecting the assessee with the transactions mentioned in the seized documents, leading to the dismissal of the department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>