<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 467 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347710</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of the security deposit as income from an adventure in the nature of trade. The appeals filed by the department were dismissed, affirming that the deposit did not qualify as taxable income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2017 09:18:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 467 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347710</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of the security deposit as income from an adventure in the nature of trade. The appeals filed by the department were dismissed, affirming that the deposit did not qualify as taxable income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>