<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 466 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347709</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals challenging penalties under section 271(1)(b) of the I.T. Act for non-compliance with notices for A.Ys. 2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08. Despite acknowledging procedural deficiencies, the Tribunal canceled the penalties for all three years, citing valid reasons presented by the assessee for non-compliance. This decision aligned with precedents canceling penalties in similar cases, emphasizing consistency in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2017 09:18:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 466 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347709</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals challenging penalties under section 271(1)(b) of the I.T. Act for non-compliance with notices for A.Ys. 2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08. Despite acknowledging procedural deficiencies, the Tribunal canceled the penalties for all three years, citing valid reasons presented by the assessee for non-compliance. This decision aligned with precedents canceling penalties in similar cases, emphasizing consistency in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>