<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 458 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347701</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellants&#039; Service Tax payments were not made due to a mistake of law or fact. The conflicting Tribunal decisions regarding the application of the statutory time limit under Section 11B to refunds of illegal levies led to a referral to a Larger Bench for clarification. The Registry was instructed to facilitate this referral for a conclusive decision on the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2017 09:17:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 458 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347701</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellants&#039; Service Tax payments were not made due to a mistake of law or fact. The conflicting Tribunal decisions regarding the application of the statutory time limit under Section 11B to refunds of illegal levies led to a referral to a Larger Bench for clarification. The Registry was instructed to facilitate this referral for a conclusive decision on the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>