<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 447 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347690</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the decision to deny CENVAT credit to the appellant for using photocopies instead of original bills of entry, citing minor procedural irregularities should not lead to denial of substantial benefits. The appellant&#039;s compliance with producing necessary documents during adjudication was considered, leading to the reversal of the credit denial and emphasizing the balance between regulatory compliance and ensuring genuine claims are not unjustly rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 447 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347690</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the decision to deny CENVAT credit to the appellant for using photocopies instead of original bills of entry, citing minor procedural irregularities should not lead to denial of substantial benefits. The appellant&#039;s compliance with producing necessary documents during adjudication was considered, leading to the reversal of the credit denial and emphasizing the balance between regulatory compliance and ensuring genuine claims are not unjustly rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>