https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347676 The court held that the Special Judge under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) is part of the judicial setup, emphasizing the need for independent action in determining custody. It clarified that police custody cannot exceed fifteen days. The court invalidated a remand order extending custody beyond the permissible period, stressing adherence to Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The judgment highlighted the importance of judicial officers' diligence in handling remand requests and the role of the Public Prosecutor in ensuring compliance with the law. The impugned order was deemed illegal and set aside. en-us Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Sep 2017 08:20:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347676 The court held that the Special Judge under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) is part of the judicial setup, emphasizing the need for independent action in determining custody. It clarified that police custody cannot exceed fifteen days. The court invalidated a remand order extending custody beyond the permissible period, stressing adherence to Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The judgment highlighted the importance of judicial officers' diligence in handling remand requests and the role of the Public Prosecutor in ensuring compliance with the law. The impugned order was deemed illegal and set aside. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347676