<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 989 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194465</link>
    <description>A company director cannot seek quashing of a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act prosecution under Section 482 CrPC merely because the complaint does not reproduce the exact words of Section 141. Broad averments that the director and others approached the complainant, represented the company, sought time for repayment, and were actively involved in the company&#039;s affairs were held sufficient at the threshold. The Court emphasised that meticulous scrutiny is not undertaken at the quashing stage; whether the statutory requirements are ultimately proved is a matter for trial. The petition for quashing therefore failed and the criminal case was allowed to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 18:31:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 989 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194465</link>
      <description>A company director cannot seek quashing of a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act prosecution under Section 482 CrPC merely because the complaint does not reproduce the exact words of Section 141. Broad averments that the director and others approached the complainant, represented the company, sought time for repayment, and were actively involved in the company&#039;s affairs were held sufficient at the threshold. The Court emphasised that meticulous scrutiny is not undertaken at the quashing stage; whether the statutory requirements are ultimately proved is a matter for trial. The petition for quashing therefore failed and the criminal case was allowed to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>