https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194461 The court ruled in favor of the State Government, allowing it to adjust the amount owed by the plaintiff against the dues claimed. The court held that the adjustment was not subject to court-fee as it was a mutual adjustment of accounts. Additionally, the court found that the plaintiff failed to provide evidence of exemption from the cesses, leading to a reduction in the plaintiff's entitlement and an order to pay costs to the State Government. The judgment emphasized the legal principles surrounding mutual adjustments and supported the State Government's actions in this case. en-us Thu, 03 May 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Sep 2017 18:07:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194461 The court ruled in favor of the State Government, allowing it to adjust the amount owed by the plaintiff against the dues claimed. The court held that the adjustment was not subject to court-fee as it was a mutual adjustment of accounts. Additionally, the court found that the plaintiff failed to provide evidence of exemption from the cesses, leading to a reduction in the plaintiff's entitlement and an order to pay costs to the State Government. The judgment emphasized the legal principles surrounding mutual adjustments and supported the State Government's actions in this case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 May 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194461