<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1933 (11) TMI 22 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194460</link>
    <description>Where a lease is terminated by notice and the tenant remains in possession without repudiating a proposal to pay enhanced rent, continued occupation may amount to acceptance of the proposed terms, making the enhanced rent recoverable. Interest on arrears of rent was not available absent a contract, proved usage, or other basis showing such liability. A claim for timber value that was agreed to be deducted from rent arose from the same transaction as the rent claim and could therefore be allowed as an equitable set-off without a separate court-fee. On that basis, the decree was increased only for arrears of rent, while refusal of interest and allowance of set-off were maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 18:04:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1933 (11) TMI 22 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194460</link>
      <description>Where a lease is terminated by notice and the tenant remains in possession without repudiating a proposal to pay enhanced rent, continued occupation may amount to acceptance of the proposed terms, making the enhanced rent recoverable. Interest on arrears of rent was not available absent a contract, proved usage, or other basis showing such liability. A claim for timber value that was agreed to be deducted from rent arose from the same transaction as the rent claim and could therefore be allowed as an equitable set-off without a separate court-fee. On that basis, the decree was increased only for arrears of rent, while refusal of interest and allowance of set-off were maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>