https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194459 Order 41 Rule 27 permits an appellate court to direct recording of additional evidence where a trial court improperly refused material evidence; the appellate remand was therefore proper to allow respondents to lead and test evidence on misfeasance. On the merits the tribunal assessed documentary and oral proofs to determine directors' liability and entitlement to claimed sums; claims lacking contractual or agency basis or evidential support were disallowed, while proved items (including specified stock, furniture, vehicle adjustments and a wrongful remission) were allowed. The High Court's factual findings and decree, including the remand for further evidence, were upheld. en-us Mon, 26 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Sep 2017 17:36:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194459 Order 41 Rule 27 permits an appellate court to direct recording of additional evidence where a trial court improperly refused material evidence; the appellate remand was therefore proper to allow respondents to lead and test evidence on misfeasance. On the merits the tribunal assessed documentary and oral proofs to determine directors' liability and entitlement to claimed sums; claims lacking contractual or agency basis or evidential support were disallowed, while proved items (including specified stock, furniture, vehicle adjustments and a wrongful remission) were allowed. The High Court's factual findings and decree, including the remand for further evidence, were upheld. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 26 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194459