https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194458 The Court held that the summary suit procedure under Order XXXVII of the Civil Procedure Code is not applicable to suits governed by the Bombay Money-lenders Act. The Court emphasized that the Act's mandatory duties on the Court regarding money-lenders' obligations cannot be fulfilled if the defendant's defense rights are restricted by the summary suit procedure. The Court granted unconditional leave to the defendant to defend the suit, setting aside the previous order and prioritizing the Act's provisions over the summary suit procedure. en-us Mon, 30 Jun 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Sep 2017 17:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194458 The Court held that the summary suit procedure under Order XXXVII of the Civil Procedure Code is not applicable to suits governed by the Bombay Money-lenders Act. The Court emphasized that the Act's mandatory duties on the Court regarding money-lenders' obligations cannot be fulfilled if the defendant's defense rights are restricted by the summary suit procedure. The Court granted unconditional leave to the defendant to defend the suit, setting aside the previous order and prioritizing the Act's provisions over the summary suit procedure. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Jun 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194458