<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 1048 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194457</link>
    <description>The court rejected the petition, emphasizing the need for detailed evidence to determine the petitioner&#039;s status as a money lender and the nature of the transaction. It clarified that the observations made were solely to assess the respondent&#039;s bona fide defense. The court stated that if the petitioner initiates a civil suit, the proceedings will be adjudicated independently.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 16:56:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 1048 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194457</link>
      <description>The court rejected the petition, emphasizing the need for detailed evidence to determine the petitioner&#039;s status as a money lender and the nature of the transaction. It clarified that the observations made were solely to assess the respondent&#039;s bona fide defense. The court stated that if the petitioner initiates a civil suit, the proceedings will be adjudicated independently.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>