<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 597 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194456</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside SEBI&#039;s order directing the Appellant company not to access the capital market for four years, finding insufficient evidence of market manipulation. The Tribunal also ruled that the direction to prosecute the company through its directors/officers exceeded its jurisdiction. The appeals were allowed in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:55:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 597 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194456</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside SEBI&#039;s order directing the Appellant company not to access the capital market for four years, finding insufficient evidence of market manipulation. The Tribunal also ruled that the direction to prosecute the company through its directors/officers exceeded its jurisdiction. The appeals were allowed in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>