<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 432 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347675</link>
    <description>The judgment addressed compliance with the court&#039;s order on collecting cheques for duty payment, concluding that officers should cease the practice. An enquiry found officers acted in the government&#039;s interest but lacked transparency. Accepting undated cheques was deemed illegal, not constituting actual payment. Officers were held accountable for delaying revenue collection. Potential corruption under the Prevention of Corruption Act was investigated. The court emphasized the need for a stronger vigilance system in tax departments, proposing a regulatory framework for better oversight. The judgment stressed transparency, accountability, and adherence to statutory provisions in tax collection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 432 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347675</link>
      <description>The judgment addressed compliance with the court&#039;s order on collecting cheques for duty payment, concluding that officers should cease the practice. An enquiry found officers acted in the government&#039;s interest but lacked transparency. Accepting undated cheques was deemed illegal, not constituting actual payment. Officers were held accountable for delaying revenue collection. Potential corruption under the Prevention of Corruption Act was investigated. The court emphasized the need for a stronger vigilance system in tax departments, proposing a regulatory framework for better oversight. The judgment stressed transparency, accountability, and adherence to statutory provisions in tax collection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>