https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194454 An alternative statutory remedy does not bar writ intervention where the impugned order is alleged and found to be a nullity, because a void order has no legal efficacy. On that basis, the writ was maintainable. A tribunal is also not rendered functus officio in relation to correcting or withdrawing a void order, since such an order is treated as no order in law. However, relief affecting mortgaged documents could not be granted without impleading the principal borrower and other directly affected persons, so the matter required remand for fresh consideration after joining all necessary parties. en-us Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Sep 2017 11:11:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194454 An alternative statutory remedy does not bar writ intervention where the impugned order is alleged and found to be a nullity, because a void order has no legal efficacy. On that basis, the writ was maintainable. A tribunal is also not rendered functus officio in relation to correcting or withdrawing a void order, since such an order is treated as no order in law. However, relief affecting mortgaged documents could not be granted without impleading the principal borrower and other directly affected persons, so the matter required remand for fresh consideration after joining all necessary parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194454