https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194445 The court found that the petitioner's challenge to the show cause notice and initiation of re-assessment proceedings under the Madhya Pradesh VAT Act, 2002 was premature. The court advised the petitioner to respond to the notice and present arguments before the authority. As the authority had the power to initiate re-assessment if the petitioner was under-assessed, the court did not find grounds to quash the notice or the proceedings. The court directed the petitioner to reply to the notice within two weeks, with no punitive action for that period, and without expressing any opinion on the case's merits. The writ petitions were disposed of without cost orders. en-us Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Sep 2017 11:00:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194445 The court found that the petitioner's challenge to the show cause notice and initiation of re-assessment proceedings under the Madhya Pradesh VAT Act, 2002 was premature. The court advised the petitioner to respond to the notice and present arguments before the authority. As the authority had the power to initiate re-assessment if the petitioner was under-assessed, the court did not find grounds to quash the notice or the proceedings. The court directed the petitioner to reply to the notice within two weeks, with no punitive action for that period, and without expressing any opinion on the case's merits. The writ petitions were disposed of without cost orders. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194445